Zurueck zur Suche

Reporte zur Charge UJ8768A

Verknuepft ueber VAERS_ID mit VAERSDATA, Vax und Symptoms

1Reporte angezeigt
0Todesfaelle
0Hospitalisiert
0Lebensbedrohlich
0Bleibende Schaeden
CO 1

VAERS 2679297

UNKNOWN MANUFACTURER · VACCINE NOT SPECIFIED (NO BRAND NAME) · Charge UJ8768A

gering
Staat
CO
Alter
4,0
Geschlecht
F
Eingang
05.09.2023
Impfdatum
24.08.2023
Beginn
24.08.2023
Tage bis Beginn
0,0
Dosis
1
Route/Site
OT / -
Tod: unbekannt Lebensbedrohlich: unbekannt Hospital: unbekannt Disable: unbekannt ER: unbekannt Erholt: nein
Incorrect dose administered No adverse event

Symptomtext

administered reconstituted pentacel along with another non-sanofi hib vaccine to a patient concurrently with no reported adverse event; Initial information received on 28-Aug-2023 regarding an unsolicited valid non-serious case received from a other health professional. This case involves a 4-year-old female patient for whom reconstituted Diphtheria/Tetanus/5 Hybrid Ac Pertussis/IPV(VERO)/HIB(PRP/T) Vaccine [Pentacel (Vero)] was administered along with another non-sanofi hib vaccine HIB vaccine CONJ (OMPC) [Pedvaxhib] concurrently with no reported adverse event. The patient's past medical history, medical treatment(s), vaccination(s) and family history were not provided. On 24-Aug-2023, the patient received a dose of 0.5 ml (Frequency: twice) dose 1 of suspect Diphtheria/Tetanus/5 Hybrid AC pertussis/IPV(VERO)/HIB(PRP/T) vaccine of standard strength suspension for injection (lot: UJ8768A, Expiry date: 19-Mar-2024) via intramuscular route in left administration site for Immunization along with another non-sanofi hib vaccine PEDVAXHIB not produced by Sanofi Pasteur with unknown strength, batch number & expiry date to a patient concurrently with no reported adverse event (product preparation error) (latency: same day). Action taken: not applicable. At time of reporting, the outcome was Unknown. This suspected adverse reaction report is submitted and classified as a medication error solely and exclusively to ensure the marketing authorization holder's compliance with the requirements set out in the Directive 2001/83/EC and Module VI of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practices. The classification as a medical error is in no way intended, nor should it be interpreted or construed as an allegation or claim made by the marketing authorization holder that any third party has contributed to or is to be held liable for the occurrence of this medication error.

Weitere VAERSDATA-Felder
Praegender Schweregrund
Incorrect dose administered
Hospital-Tage
-
Labordaten
-
Aktuelle Erkrankungen
-
Vorgeschichte
-
Andere Medikamente
-
Allergien
-
Vorherige Impfungen
-